Richard E. Klosterman

The What if? Planning Support System

What if? PSS is an interactive, GIS-based planning support system (PSS) which supports the most important and difficult aspects of the land planning process: conducting a land suitability analysis, projecting future land use demand, and allocating the projected demand to suitable locations. The system allows users quickly and easily to create alternative development scenarios and determine their likely impacts on future land use patterns and associated population and employment trends. The package is easy to use, customized to the users data base and policy issues, and provides outputs in a variety of easy to understand maps, reports, and charts.

What if? PSS is being jointly developed by LDR International, Inc. (LDR), Data Chromatics, Inc. (DCI) and Community Analysis and Planning Systems, Inc. (CAPS). LDR is a planning and urban design firm with an international practice and has developed award-winning comprehensive plans for cities, counties, and regions. DCI is a leading-edge computer technology that specializes in developing and applying new GIS applications. Richard Klosterman, President of CAPS, is a nationally known expert in developing GIS-based tools and computer solutions for a wide range of planning applications.

This paper describes the components of the What if? PSS system, the analysis procedures incorporated in the model, the general procedures for using the system, and sample model outputs. The paper includes three major sections. The first section, System Overview, provides a general overview of the What if? PSS system and the modeling process incorporated into the model. The second section, Using the Model, describes the major components of the system and the general procedures for using each component. Sample system screens and outputs are also described. The final section, Model Enhancements and Further Information, identifies sources for further information on the What if? PSS system.


SYSTEM OVERVIEW

As its name suggests, the What if? PSS does not attempt to predict future conditions exactly. Instead it attempts to determine what would happen if certain policy choices are made and assumptions concerning future conditions are correct. Policy choices which can be considered in the model include the staged expansion of public infrastructure and the implementation of alternative land use controls. Assumptions which can be considered in the model include future population and employment trends, household characteristics, and development densities. What if? PSS provides a single integrated package which supports the most important and difficult aspects of the land use planning process including:

o Viewing Information. What if? PSS's "Base Data" option allows users to select, view, and print maps and reports displaying currently available information on all aspects of the study area.

o Suitability Analysis. What if? PSS's "Suitability" option allows the user easily to select the environmental factors to be used in determining the relative suitability of different locations for different uses, and to specify the relative importance of alternative suitability factors and the ratings for the different factor types. These values are used to generate suitability maps and associated reports showing the relative suitability of different locations for different land uses.

o Projecting Demand. What if? PSS's "Growth" option employs user-specified growth factors to determine the projected demand for different land uses in each projection year. Growth characteristics which can be specified by the user include: projected population and employment growth at ten-year intervals, the characteristics of future housing, assumed employment densities, and desired quantities of agricultural, forestry, and environmental protection land. The projected demands are converted into the equivalent demand for different types of land which can be viewed in summary reports.

o Allocating Projected Demand. What if? PSS's "Allocation" module allocates the projected demand for land to different locations on the basis of their relative suitability for alternate uses and user-specified land use controls and infrastructure expansion plans. The model outputs predicts future land use patterns at ten-year intervals for the study area and for sub areas such as political jurisdictions. These outputs can be viewed in maps and report formats.

Modeling Process

What if? PSS is a "bottom-up" model which begins with homogeneous land units or uniform analysis zones (UAZs), applies alternative public policy choices to these units, and then derives regional conditions (e.g., population and employment growth trends) by aggregating the smaller land units. UAZs are GIS-generated polygons which are homogeneous in all respects considered in the model. Thus, for instance, all points within a UAZ have the same slope, are located in the same municipality, have the same zoning designation, are within the same distance of an existing or proposed highway, and so on.

UAZs are created by using GIS overlay functions to combine all of the relevant layers of information to define the UAZs to be used in a study area. The map layers can contain information on natural conditions (e.g., slopes, soils, and scenic vistas), existing and proposed infrastructure (e.g., the proximity to intersections or major roads and the availability of sewer and water service), and land use controls such as zoning districts and planned land uses. The PSS combines these layers to produce UAZs which contain information from each of the constituent layers, i.e., each UAZ contains information on the slope, the availability of sewer and water service, planned land use, and so on for all points lying inside of it.

What if? PSS projects future land use patterns by balancing the supply of, and demand for, land suitable for different uses at different locations. Alternative policy choices can be incorporated into the model it two ways. First, different map layers can be added to represent alternate policy choices, e.g., alternative land use or infrastructure expansion plans. Policy choices can also be incorporated into the model by applying them directly to the appropriate UAZs, e.g., by increasing or decreasing the allowable development densities for all of the UAZs located in a particular township or municipality.

User-defined alternative visions for the area's future can be easily explored by defining alternative suitability, growth, and allocation scenarios. For example, one scenario could determine the effect of continuing current development policies. Another scenario could consider the impact of policies that severely limited growth in scenic areas and on land highly suitable for agricultural uses. Still another scenario could determine the implications of allowing growth to continue until it reached specified density levels for all developable parcels in the study area. Which UAZs are developable would be determined by policy assumptions specified by the user. These alternatives express in concrete policy term's alternative development scenarios which can be referred to by user-defined labels and text descriptions.

The modeling process is iterative in that, for a particular scenario, users start with a set of assumptions about land use suitability and another set of assumptions about projected growth demands. When these assumptions are combined with assumptions about land use controls and infrastructure plans in an allocation scenario they may find that there is insufficient land for a particular land use. This, in turn, would require that some suitability, growth, or allocation assumptions are changed. Users must then re-run the model to see if the new set of assumptions produce a more appropriate allocation.

USING THE MODEL

When users load What if? PSS, they are presented with the opening screen shown in Figure 1. This screen contains the standard Windows menu bar, File, and Help options. In addition, it includes the following specialized menu options: (1) Suitability, (2) Growth, and (3) Allocation. These options are described in detail below.


Figure 1: What if? PSS Opening Screen


SUITABILITY OPTION

What if? PSS incorporates procedures for determining the relative suitability of different locations for alternative land uses which previously took weeks or months to complete into an quick and easy-to-use computer-based process. The suitability analysis process involves the following steps: (1) obtaining the user-specified criteria to be used in determining the relative suitability of different locations; (2) using these criteria to evaluate alternative locations with respect to these criteria; and (3) displaying the analysis results to the user.

The following description of What if? PSS's Suitability option is divided into four sections. The first section provides brief definitions of the terminology used to describe the suitability analysis process. The second section discusses the general procedure which the model uses to determine the relative suitability of different locations. The third section reviews the forms which the system provides for entering the required suitability data. The final section describes What if? PSS's suitability outputs.

Suitability Analysis Terms

The following definitions help clarify the discussion of the suitability analysis process:

Suitability Factors. "Suitability Factors" are the characteristics of the land that will be considered in determining the relative suitability of different locations for alternative uses. The factors to be used for a particular land use are specified by the user and can include the full range of natural features including slopes, soils, wet lands, aquifer recharge areas, flood plains, scenic areas, and hazardous areas.

Factor Weights. "Factor Weights" are numerical scores indicating the relative importance of the different factors used to determine the relative suitability of different locations for a particular land use. Thus, for example, the Slope factor could be given a factor weight of 2 and the Soils factor could be given a factor weight of 1 to indicate that slope is considered to be twice as important as soils in determining a site's suitability for a particular land use.

Factor Types. "Factor Types" are the set of possible values for a particular factor. Thus, for example, there could be five different slope types in a particular location, e.g., Less than 10%, 10% to Less than 15%, 15% to Less than 20%, (4) 20% to Less than 25%, and (5) 25% and above.

Factor Rating. "Factor Ratings" are numerical values indicating the relative suitability of locations with a particular factor type for locating a specified land use. Thus, for example, factor ratings can be specified for each of the five slope types listed above to indicate the relative suitability of each slope type for locating industrial land uses. What if? PSS allows the user to rate each factor type on an five-point scale. Zero values can also be used to exclude development from areas corresponding to a particular factor value (e.g., all areas with a slope of 25% or more).

Suitability Score. The "Suitability Score" is a numerical value indicating a location's overall suitability for a given land use when all of the factors are considered. The suitability score for a particular UAZ is determined by: (1) multiplying the UAZ's factor rating for each factor by the corresponding factor weight; and (2) summing these products. Suitability scores are computed for all UAZs and all land uses.

Land Use Conversion. "Land Use Conversion" refers to situations in which an area's land use changes during the development process from one land use to a different land use. Thus, for example, an area which is currently is devoted to agricultural uses may be converted to industrial uses during the growth allocation process.

Suitability Analysis Process

Given this terminology, the suitability analysis process involves the following steps:

Identifying Suitability Factors. The user must first identify the suitability factors to be considered for a particular land use. Different factors may be selected for different land uses; for example, distance from freeway interchanges may be important for locating retail and office establishments but not important for locating single-family developments. As a result, suitability factors must be selected for each land use considered in the study.

Specifying Factor Weights. Next, the user must specify the factor weights, i.e., the relative importance of each factor in determining a UAZ's suitability for a particular land use. Factor weights are assigned on a five-point scale from 1 (low) to 5 (high). Factor weights must be assigned for all suitability factors land uses considered in the analysis.

Specifying Factor Ratings. The user must then specify ratings for each factor type, e.g., for each slope type, each soil type, and so on. The factor types are rated on an six-point scale: 5 (High), 4 (Moderately High), 3 (Moderate), 2 (Moderately Low), 1 (Low), and 0 (Excluded). As its name suggests, the Excluded category identifies areas from which development is to be excluded, regardless of its rating on other factors. For example, the user can specify that development is to be excluded from the 100-year flood plain, regardless of an area's suitability with respect to the other suitability factors. Factor ratings must be specified for all of the factor types land uses considered in the analysis.

Computing Suitability Scores. The model then computes the factor scores for each UAZ by multiplying the factor weights by the corresponding factor rating and summing these values. The resulting suitability scores are then used to prepare suitability maps and to allocate projected demand to alternative sites, as described below.

SUITABILITY FORMS

Suitability Scenario Selection Form

When users select the Suitability Define Scenario option from the main What if? PSS form shown in Figure 1, they are presented with the suitability scenario selection form shown in Figure 2. As its name suggests, this form is used to select a suitability scenario from a drop down list of all the previously defined scenarios. The "Description" box in the center of the form contains a user-defined description for the selected option. For example, in Figure 2 the user has selected the "Rural Preservation" suitability scenario from the sample data provided on the What if? PSS distribution disk.


Figure 2: Suitability Scenario Selection Form


After selecting a suitability scenario, the user can click on either the OK, Copy, Delete, Cancel, or Help button. The OK button is used to review or revise the assumptions specified in a previously defined suitability scenario. The Copy button is used to create a copy of the selected scenario which can be assigned a new name, description, and set of scenario assumptions. The Delete button is used to delete a previously defined scenario. The Cancel button returns the user to the main What if? PSS form. The Help button is used to access the system's on-line help.

Suitability Scenario Assumptions Form

After selecting a scenario and pressing either the "OK" or "Copy" button , the user is presented with the Suitability Scenario Assumptions form shown in Figure 3. As its name suggests, this form is used to specify the assumptions which underlie the specified suitability scenario. In particular, the form is used to specify the suitability analysis factors, factor weights, factor ratings, and land use conversions to be used in the suitability analysis.


Figure 3: Suitability Factors Considered Sheet


Text Boxes. The label at the upper left of the form identifies the scenario which was selected on the suitability scenario selection form. The drop-down list box labeled "Land Use:" allows the user to select the land use for which a particular suitability assumption is to be specified. Thus, for example, in Figure 3 the user is specifying the assumptions for the "Low Density Residential" land use for the "Rural Preservation" suitability scenario.

Command Buttons. The Suitability Scenario Assumptions form contains the following five buttons: (1) the Save All button is used to save the scenario assumptions and suitability analysis results; (2) the Save Scenario button is used to save the scenario assumptions but not the suitability analysis results; (3) the Compute button is used to perform the suitability analysis but does not save the scenario assumptions or analysis results; (4) the Cancel button returns the user to the main What if? PSS form, abandoning any changes to the assumptions; and (5) the Help button is used to access the system's on-line help.

Tabbed Forms

As shown in Figure 3, the Suitability Assumptions Screen contains four tabbed screens which are used to: (1) identify the factors to be considered in the analysis, (2) specify the factor weights for each of these factors, (3) specify the factor ratings for the different factor types, and (4) identify the land uses which may be converted to other uses.

Factors Considered Sheet. As shown in Figure 3, the Factors Considered sheet contains a series of check boxes which are used to specify the suitability factors to be considered for a particular land use for the current suitability scenario. Thus, for example, in Figure 3 the user has specified that all of the suitability factors should be considered in determining the most suitable locations for low density residential development. Suitability factors must be specified for each land use.

Factor Weights Sheet. As shown in Figure 4, the Factor Weights sheet is used to specify the weights to be assigned to each factor. The factor weights are used to reflect the user's perception of the relative importance of the suitability factors selected on the Factors Considered sheet; the values can go from a low value of 1 to a high value of 5. Thus, for instance, Figure 4 indicates that the user feels that Soils is the most important factor for locating Low Density Residential land; the 100-year flood plain is the second most important factor; and the remaining factors are less important. Factors which were not selected on the Factors Considered sheet are dimmed out, indicating that factor weights should not--in fact, cannot--be specified.


Figure 4: Suitability Factor Weights Sheet


Factor Ratings Sheet. As shown in Figure 5, the Factor Ratings sheet is used to specify the relative suitability of each type of factor (e.g., different slope and soil types in Figure 5) for the selected land use (Low Density Residential, in this example). The factor ratings range from a high value of 5 (High Suitability) to 1 (Low Suitability). Suitability values of 0 can be entered to identify areas from which development is to be excluded, regardless of its rating on other factors. Thus, for instance, in Figure 4 the zero values entered for Slopes greater than or equal to 25% will mean that Low Density Residential development will be excluded from areas that have slopes of 25% or more. Factor ratings must be specified for all of the land uses considered in the analysis.


Figure 5: Suitability Factor Ratings Sheet


Conversion Sheet. As shown in Figure 6, the Conversion sheet is used to specify land uses that are candidates for conversion from their current use (e.g., agriculture) to another use (e.g., low-density residential) as a result of the projection process. The check boxes indicate land uses that may be converted from their current use to the use displayed in the drop-down list at the top of the form. Thus, for instance, in Figure 6 the user has specified that Agriculture and Rural Residential land may be converted to Low Density Residential uses. Areas that currently contain land uses identified as available for conversion will be included in the suitability analysis. If no land uses are chosen for possible conversion, only the currently vacant land will be considered in the suitability analysis.


Figure 6: Land Use Conversion Sheet


SUITABILITY OUTPUTS

The user-specified factor weights and factor ratings values are used to calculate the overall suitability scores which indicate the relative suitability of different locations for each land use when all of the suitability factors have been considered. The user can view the suitability analysis results by selecting the Suitability View Scenario Map option from the main What if? PSS screen. The suitability analysis results can be displayed in map or report formats.

Suitability Analysis Maps. As shown in Figure 7, What if? PSS's Suitability View Scenario Maps option generates a map showing the relative suitability of different locations for each land use considered in the model. Each location's suitability is scaled from "unsuitable" to "high" based on the factor weights and ratings for the selected suitability scenario. Suitability maps for each land use can be viewed by selecting the desired land use category from the drop down list and clicking on the Render Map button.


Figure 7: Suitability Analysis Map


The suitability map displays suitability scores for each land use categorized into seven categories: (1)High; (2) Medium High; (3) Medium; (4) Medium Low; (5) Low; (6) Unsuitable; and (7) Not Considered. The Unsuitable category identifies areas for which the user has specified a value of zero on the Factors Rating sheet, e.g., areas with slopes equal to or greater than 25% in Figure 5 above. The Not Considered category identifies locations that were not considered in the suitability analysis for the selected land use.

A default color is provided for each suitability category. The user can change any color by clicking on the colored box in the map legend. The user can also display additional map layers by clicking on the Layers... button. The user can select the color, weight and fill style for each of the layers.

After selecting colors for each suitability category and appropriate fills and styles for the map features, the user can display the map by clicking on the Render Map button. The maps can be sent to the printer by clicking on the printer icon. The map display also includes the standard information, map extent, zoom in, zoom out, and pan buttons. Clicking on the Done button returns the user to the main menu.

Suitability Analysis Report. As shown in Figure 8, What if? PSS's Suitability View Scenario Report option generates a report which identifies the number of acres within each suitability class for all land uses for a specified suitability scenario. The report can be reviewed on screen or printed by clicking on the printer icon.


Figure 8: Suitability Analysis Report


Suitability Analysis Assumptions Report. As shown in Figure 9, What if? PSS's Suitability View Scenario Assumptions option generates a report listing the assumptions which underlie a specified suitability scenario. Information provided in the assumptions report include the factors which were considered in the analysis, the user-specified factor weights and rates, and any land uses that are available for intensification or re-use.


Figure 9: Suitability Analysis Assumptions Report


GROWTH OPTION

What if? PSS considers the demand for land by converting the five main categories of land use demand--residential, industrial, commercial, preservation, and locally-oriented uses--into the equivalent future land use demand. The demands are computed for up to five three periods, allowing the system to incorporate a staged development process in which future development patterns are based on the previously existing development patterns. and infrastructure improvements.

The following discussion of What if? PSS's Growth option is divided into three sections. The first section describes the general procedures that are used to compute the four different types of land use demand. The following section considers the forms that are provided for entering the required information on the different types of demand. The final section discusses the outputs provided by What if? PSS's growth option.

Growth Projection Process

Computing Residential Land Use Demand. The procedure for computing the projected demand for residential land begins by allowing the user to select between independently developed defined projections for (1) the total number of households in the larger region (e.g., county) in which the study area is located for each projection year, and (2) the assumed proportion of these households that will reside in the study area. These two values are multiplied to yield the projected number of households in the study area in each projection year.

The projected number of households in each projection year is multiplied by user-specified values for the proportion of the new housing units for each housing type (e.g., large-lot residential, multi-family, and so on). User-specified values for the assumed vacancy and loss rates are used to convert these values into the projected number of housing units that will be required in each year. Subtracting the number of existing housing units from this value and dividing by the assumed housing densities yields the projected demand for additional residential land for each housing type in each projection year.

Computing Regional Business Land Use Demand. The procedure for computing the projected demand for regional business (industrial, regional retail, and office) uses begins by allowing the user to choose between independently developed projections for the employment for each business use in each projection year. The user then specifies the assumed employment density (employees per acre) for each land use category. The system then subtracts the existing employment in each category from the projected values and multiplies this value by the assumed employment densities to compute the total number of additional number of acres that will be required in each projection year for each type of regional business demand.

Computing Preservation Land Use Demand. What if? PSS includes procedures for specifying the amount of land to be preserved for environmentally-oriented uses such as agriculture, forestry, and open space/environmental protection. The system permits the user to specify the amount of land (either the number of acres or the percentage of the study area's land) to be preserved for each preservation use in each projection years. These values are stored as land use demands in the system along with the other land use demands.

Computing Local Land Use Demand. What if? PSS also provides procedures for computing the future demand for local land uses such as parks and recreation areas, local retail uses, and public and semi-public land uses. These uses are incorporated into the model in the form of user-specified standards for the required amount of land per thousand persons for each land use. These values are multiplied by the projected population for each political jurisdiction in each projection year to compute the total amount of land that will be required for the local land uses in each projection year.

GROWTH FORMS

Growth Scenario Selection Form

After selecting the Growth Define Scenario option from the What if? PSS menu bar shown in Figure 1, the user is presented with the Growth Scenario Selection form which is used to view or revise a previously saved growth scenario. This form is identical in appearance and function to the Suitability Scenario Selection form shown in Figure 2.

Growth Assumptions Form

After choosing a growth scenario to view, modify, or create, the user is presented with the Growth Assumptions form shown in Figure 10.


Figure 10: Residential Households Assumptions Sheet


As indicated in Figure 10, the label at the top of the form displays the name of growth scenario being considered, the "MPO - Official" scenario from the sample data set provided on the What if? PSS distribution disk. The form has five buttons that function just as they did for the Suitability Assumption form described previously. In addition, the form contains five tabbed sheets which are used to specify the growth assumptions for each type of demand. The contents of each sheet are described briefly below.

Residential Sheet. As shown in Figure 10, this sheet contains two tabbed sheets which are used to specify the factors which will be used to determine the projected demand for residential land. The first sheet, labeled "Households" allows the user to select between up to five independently developed projections for the total number of households in the region (e.g., county) in which the study area is located. It also allows the user to choose between up to five independently developed projections for the study area's share of the regional population. These two values are multiplied to compute the projected number of households in the study area in each projection period.

The second Residential sheet, labeled "Housing," allows users to specify their assumptions about the new housing units which will be built in the study area. The first sheet, shown in Figure 11, allows the user to specify the assumed breakdown by housing type for new residential construction and the assumed housing density for each housing type. The second Housing sheets is used to specify the average household size for each housing type. The third sheet is used to specify the assumed residential vacancy rate and the assumed proportion of existing housing units that will be lost to demolition, fire, and so on during each projection period.


Figure 11: Residential Housing Assumptions Sheet


Industrial and Commercial Sheets. The next two sheets, labeled "Industrial" and "Commercial" are used to specify the assumptions which underlie the projected demand for regionally-oriented land uses. As shown in Figure 12, the Industrial sheet allows the user to select between up to five independently developed projections for the total regional employment in each projection year. Up to five types of industrial land can be considered in the model. The form also allows the user to specify the assumed employment density (employees per acre) for each industrial land use. The sheet labeled "Commercial" provides similar options for specifying the projected employment and employment densities for up to five different types of commercial development (e.g., regional retail, office, and mixed use).


Figure 12: Industrial Assumptions Sheet


Preservation Sheet. The Preservation sheet shown in Figure 13 allows the user to specify the amount of land which should be preserved for up to five different categories of preservation land in each projection year. The amount of land to be preserved can be specified as either an acreage or as a percentage of the total land in the study area. Zero values can be entered for scenarios which assume that no environmental preservation policies will be enacted.


Figure 13: Preservation Assumptions Sheet


Local Sheet. As shown in Figure 14, The Local sheet allows the user to specify the quantity of land that will be required per thousand persons to satisfy up to five different types of locally-oriented land uses. Locally-oriented land uses are land uses whose location and size are dependent on the local (e.g., municipal) population. These uses include local parks and recreational areas, local retail (e.g., strip malls) and public and semi-public land uses. The specified land use standards for each local land use are applied to the projected population in each political jurisdiction to compute the amount of land in each jurisdiction which must be devoted to each use.


Figure 14: Local Land Uses Assumptions Sheet


GROWTH OUTPUTS

The user-specified growth assumptions are used to calculate the projected demand in each projection year for the five general types of land use. The user can then view the projected demands corresponding to a particular set scenario assumptions by selecting the Growth View Scenario option from the main What if? PSS screen.

Growth Analysis Results Report. As shown in Figure 15, What if? PSS's Growth View Scenario Report option generates a report that identifies the projected demand for each land use in each projection year. The report can be reviewed on screen and printed by clicking on the printer icon.


Figure 15: Growth Analysis Results Report


Growth Analysis Assumptions Report. As shown in Figure 16, What if? PSS's Growth View Scenario Assumptions option generates a report listing the assumptions which underlie a growth scenario. Information provided in the assumptions report include the assumed values used to compute the projected land use demands.


Figure 16: Growth Analysis Assumptions Report


ALLOCATION OPTION

What if? PSS projects future land use patterns by allocating the projected land use demands derived from a user-selected growth scenario to different locations on the basis of their relative suitability as defined by the assumptions in a user-selected suitability scenario. If desired, the growth allocation can be controlled by user-selected land use controls (land use plans and zoning restrictions) and infrastructure plans. The projected land use patterns ca then be converted into equivalent projections for the future residential population, the distribution of dwelling units by housing type, employment, and the associated demand for pubic and semi-public land, infrastructure, and services.

The following discussion of What if? PSS's Allocation option contains four sections. The first section describes the general procedures used to allocate projected land use demands to suitable locations. The second section describes the forms that allow users to provide the information needed for the allocation process. The third section describes the What if? PSS allocation outputs. The final section discusses adjustments that can be made to modify the model outputs, for instance, made if the projected land use demands exceed the quantity of land of available suitable land.

Growth Allocation Process

As pointed out above, What if? PSS projects future land use patterns in each projection year by allocating the projected demand for each land use type to different locations on the basis of their relative suitability for that land use. For instance, residential units are assigned first to the most suitable sites, then to the second most suitable sites, and so on until all of the projected demand for residential land in a projection year has been satisfied. The user is notified if not enough land is available to satisfy the projected demand. If this occurs, the user must modify the suitability, growth, or allocation scenario assumptions as will be described below. The projected land use demands are derived from a previously defined growth scenario. The suitability of different locations is determined by the assumptions specified in a previously defined suitability scenario. The order in which projected demand are satisfied (i.e., which land use demand is satisfied first, which demand is satisfied second, and so on) is determined by a user-specified allocation order.

What if? PSS allocation process is designed to incorporate proposed changes to the area's infrastructure such as the construction of major roads or the expansion of sewer and water service areas. To do this, users must first specify a previously defined sewer or water service expansion plan which indicates areas that will and will not be served in each projection year. Next, the user must specify land uses which require, or must be near to, a particular type of infrastructure. Thus, for example, higher-density residential land uses can be assumed to require sewer and water services while agriculture and parks/recreation can be assumed to not require them. Similarly, regional retail outlets might be assumed to be located nearby interstate interchanges and major intersections; local retail can be assumed to be located in close proximity to major roads; and other land uses may not need to be close to either. This information is used by the system to allocate land uses to only those areas which the selected infrastructure plans indicate will have the required infrastructure availability or accessibility.

Similarly, What if? PSS incorporates user-selected land use controls by only allowing the projected land use demand to only be allocated to areas in which the land use is permitted or planned. That is, for example, the projected demand for industrial land can only be allocated to areas which are planned or zoned for industrial uses.

ALLOCATION FORMS

Allocation Scenario Selection Form

After selecting the Allocation Define Scenario option from the What if? PSS menu bar shown in Figure 1, the user is presented with the Allocation Scenario Selection form shown in Figure 17. This form is similar in appearance and function to the suitability and growth scenario selection forms except that it indicates the suitability and growth scenarios which correspond to the selected allocation scenario. Creating a new allocation scenario requires the user to select the suitability and growth scenarios that will be incorporated into the new allocation scenario.

Figure 17: Allocation Scenario Selection Form


Allocation Scenario Assumptions Form

After choosing an allocation scenario to view, modify, or create, the user is presented with the Allocation Assumptions form shown in Figure 18.


Figure 18: Allocation Scenario Assumptions Form


As indicated in Figure 18, the label at the top of the form identifies the allocation scenario being considered, in this case the Compact allocation scenario and five buttons which function just as they did for the Suitability and Growth Assumption forms described previously. In addition, the form contains three tabbed sheets which are used to specify the assumptions which underlie the selected allocation scenario. The contents of each form are described briefly below.

Allocation Priority Sheet. As shown in Figure 18, the Allocation Priority sheet is used to specify the order in which projected land use demands are to be allocated, i.e., the land use demand to be satisfied first, the demand to be satisfied second, and so on. The allocation priority list can be revised by selecting a land use label (not the number) from the list and dragging it to its preferred location in the list. Thus, for example, in Figure 18, the user has specified that the Open Space/Environmental Protection demand should be satisfied first; the Agriculture demand should be satisfied second; and so on.

Infrastructure Sheet. As shown in Figure 19, the Infrastructure form has two tabbed sheets. The Infrastructure Plans sheet is used to identify the infrastructure plans which are to be used to guide the allocation process. For instance, in Figure 19, the user has specified that the compact water and sewer service plans and road and intersection phasing plans should be used in the allocation process. If no infrastructure plans are selected, all of the land uses will be located in their most suitable locations, regardless of the availability of sewer and water service or their proximity to major roads or intersections.


Figure 19: Infrastructure Plans Sheet


As shown in Figure 20, the Infrastructure Required sheet contains a series of check boxes which are used to specify land uses which require or must be near to each type of infrastructure. Thus, for example, the values specified in Figure 20 indicate that: (1) all of the residential land uses will be assumed to require water and sewer service; (2) the Office and Neighborhood Retail must be located near major roads; and (3) Regional Retail uses must be located near major intersections.


Figure 20: Infrastructure Required Sheet


Land Use Controls Sheet. As shown in Figure 21, this sheet is used to select from previously defined land use plans and zoning ordinances that will be used to control the location of future growth.


Figure 21: Land Use Controls Sheet


ALLOCATION OUTPUT

The user-selected suitability and growth scenarios are used to project future land use patterns, subject to any land use controls or infrastructure plans selected by the user. The user can view the allocation analysis results by selecting the Allocation View Scenario option from the main What if? PSS screen. The allocation analysis results can be displayed in map and report formats.

Allocation Map. As shown in Figure 22, What if? PSS's Allocation View Scenario Map option generates a map showing the projected land use in each allocation year. The "Year" pull down menu can be used to specify the projection year for which the projected land uses are to be shown. The allocation map displays the current or projected land uses in the default colors. The user can change any color by clicking on the colored box in the map legend.


Figure 22: Allocation Map


The user can also display additional map features by clicking on the Layers button. Possible additional map features include UAZ boundaries, city and county boundaries, existing land uses, streams, existing and proposed primary roads. The user can select a fill for polygon features, such as existing land uses and city boundaries. The user can select a line type for line features, such as roads and streams.

After selecting colors for each suitability category and appropriate fills or line styles for the map features, the user can display the map by clicking on the Render Map button. The maps can be sent to the printer by clicking on the printer icon. The map display also includes the standard information, map extent, zoom in, zoom out, and pan buttons. Clicking on the Done button returns the user to the main menu.

Allocation Report. As shown in Figure 23 What if? PSS's Allocation View Scenario Report option produces a report which records the projected quantities of each land use in the study area and each political subdivision in each projection year. The Allocation View Scenario Assumptions option also provides a printed report recording all of the assumptions which underlie an allocation scenario.


Figure 23: Allocation Report


ADJUSTING MODEL OUTPUTS

Dealing With Insufficient Land

As pointed out above, What if? PSS projects future land use patterns by allocated the user-specified land use demands to different locations on the basis of the user-specified suitability of different locations in the study area. If the projected demands exceed the available land, the process will "run out of land" and generate an error message. This is not an error in the program; it is a result of unforeseen inconsistencies in the user's input assumptions. This situation occurs when the demand for a particular land use exceeds the amount of available land which is suitable for that use. In this case, the user can modify either: (1) modify the suitability scenario assumptions to provide more suitable land, (2) modify the growth scenario assumptions to reduce the demand for land, or (3) modify the allocation scenario assumptions.

This process is necessarily iterative as a user will, first, create assumptions about the suitability of land in a suitability scenario. Next the user creates assumptions about the projected demands for land in a growth scenario. Third, the user defines assumptions about the allocation order and infrastructure and land use controls that will guide the allocation process in an allocation scenario. The allocation option then does the allocation, matching the available suitable land against the projected demand, subject to the specified infrastructure and land use controls. If there is insufficient demand, then one or more of the earlier assumptions must be modified.

There are several ways to increase the availability of a particular land use. The first is to increase the amount of land that can accommodate future demand for this use. This can be done by using the Conversion sheet on the Suitability Assumptions form to specify that additional land uses can be converted to a particular land use. For instance, if not enough land is available to satisfy the projected demand for, say, industrial uses, the user can specify that other current land uses, say agricultural land, can be converted to industrial uses. This will increase the pool of land in which the projected industrial demand can be located.

Problems of not having sufficient land to accommodate projected demand can also be dealt with by modifying the growth assumptions. Lowering the assumed growth rates for the housing units, industrial employment, or commercial employment will clearly reduce the demand for the available land. Unfortunately, these growth rate are determined by factors outside of the model and users should use realistic values. The projected demand for land can also be reduced by increasing the assumed densities at which future development will occur.

A third way to increase the availability of land to satisfy a particular type of demand is to upgrade the order in which that demand is considered during allocation process. A use that has a higher allocation order, will be considered first; as a result, this increases the likelihood that enough land will be available to satisfy that use. However, revising the allocation order means that another use will necessarily have a lower allocation order and enough land may not be found to fulfill the demand for that use. As a result, the user may have to experiment with different allocation orders to satisfy all of the required land use demands, given the available quantities of suitable land.

The availability of land can also be increased by modifying the infrastructure and land use controls specified in the allocation module. For example, the user can select alternative infrastructure plans which increase the supply of land provided with required sewer and water service. A less restrictive land use plan or zoning ordinance can also be selected to increase the number of locations in which future development is permitted to occur.

Shifting the Allocation Distribution

The user can influence the spatial distribution of the allocated land in two ways. The first is by increasing or decreasing the required development densities in the growth option. Increasing future densities will mean that less additional land is required to absorb future growth; this will encourage compactness in the allocation of land. Conversely, using lower densities will require more land, leading to a more dispersed development pattern.

A second way to influence the spatial distribution of the allocated land is through the allocation order specified in the allocation option. A higher allocation order means that a particular land use will be allocated before other uses. Other things being equal, this will this tend to disperse the allocation of this use because more locations are available for satisfying the specified demand. On the other, if the use is given a lower allocation priority, it will tend to located in fewer areas because areas which might have accommodated this use have already been absorbed by previously allocated uses.

MODEL ENHANCEMENTS AND FURTHER INFORMATION

Anticipated future enhancements include the addition of: (1) a fiscal impact module, (2) a "design" module which allows users to develop land use and infrastructure plans on the screen, (3) an evaluation module, and (4) an interface with traffic demand models. A fully operational version of What if? PSS that can be used to analyze data for a real community is now available.

The What if? PSS web site, http://www.dcigis.whatif/whatif.htm also provides an interactive executive summary of the product and additional information, including pricing. For additional information call Plan it! at (410) 880-4845. Version 3.02 of the software is available to the first twenty users of the software under a special arrangement.


Richard E. Klosterman, President
Community Analysis and Planning Systems, Inc.
78 Hickory Lane
Hudson, Ohio 44236-2707
Phone: (216) 342-0535
Fax: (216) 650-9087
E-mail: Klosterman@UAkron.edu