Andrew Dickman, A.I.C.P 

Panagiotis Tsoumpas, M.S. 

Sifu Zhou, Ph.D.

TITLE

"GIS Supports Social Services Planning in South Florida" 

ABSTRACT

Allocating social service resources to needy communities and populations in a fast changing, multi-cultural urban region is becoming even more complex due to welfare reform and the trend for disinvestment of social support systems.

In 1993, the Miami district of Florida's Department of Children and Families (DCF) began building a geographic information system (GIS) to better define South Florida's social pathologies and to support public policy decisions which previously relied upon inadequate information. Today, the Office of Research and Planning is using GIS to assist with National and State welfare reform, a neighborhood-based decentralization of the DCF's programs within a two county region, and the charter Metro-Dade County Social Services Master Plan. Furthermore, previously inaccessible social data is now available to grass-roots organizations for grant applications, planning, monitoring and evaluating of neighborhood programs. 

Client data from DCF databases and from contracted service provider databases is extracted and cleaned in order to bring it to the format required by ArcView and ArcInfo. After the data is geocoded, the resulting point coverages are aggregated by polygon areas such as census block groups, municipal and neighborhood boundaries, county commission districts, state senate and house districts, and school board districts. This data is then analyzed according to planning areas based on population, social characteristics and other criteria important to social services policy makers. Based on this analysis, DCF prepares strategies and recommendations along with GIS maps and charts, which are published and presented to a multi-governmental audience responsible for implementing social programs in the region.

ArcInfo, ArcView, Arc Macro Language (AML), Dbase IV, and MS Excel are all part of the application described above which converts confidential client records into legally safe, yet meaningful informational products that can be displayed for multiple purposes. 

BACKGROUND

Shortly after Hurricane Andrew devastated Dade County, Florida in August 1992, DCF began experimenting with GIS maps as a tool for targeting social conditions where public health and human services resource should be directed. The maps presented a new perspective for public administrators, welfare workers, health officials and community advocates to collectively, rapidly and intuitively evaluate several types of information against a common geographic backdrop to create a logical service delivery strategy for crucially needed human services. 

By 1993, DCF was satisfied that GIS technology would improve planning and then decided to invest in their first SUN Workstation, a single user ArcInfo license, and a C-size 8-pen plotter. Local governments and other State agencies contributed basemap coverages, which kept startup costs down, and DCF was welcomed as a new user into the local GIS family, heretofore dominated by environmental and land management applications. At this time, and using limited Federal hurricane recovery funds, the DCF attracted two planners experienced with ArcInfo and ArcView GIS to work as temporary employees setting up and demonstrating GIS capability in the health and human services. This initiative operated out of the DCF's Hurricane Andrew recovery operations center, coined the Community Health Action Teams (CHAT) in southern Dade County. 

Consequently, the DCF opened a small planning office, equipped with the new GIS technology, to assist CHATs in their mobile outreach program designed to provide rapid public health services and community-based welfare support in the hurricane impact area. Census data and locally collected service data were uploaded into the GIS to build demographic profiles by neighborhood in order to direct the 40 member CHAT program into services zones, termed "CHAT Zones." Seven CHATs canvassed the impact area providing wide ranging services, making referrals to other service providers, and capturing client information, which was immediately brought into the GIS for analysis. In this capacity, GIS provided CHAT management with timely decision support information within an emergency recovery scenario directing mobile personnel to geographic areas in greatest need of health and social services.

In addition, the DCF's fledgling GIS project gave strategic support to local public health officials and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) when a Hanta Virus outbreak occurred in South Dade. GIS was used to develop an artificial grid for selecting random trap sites, and then to display and analyze results from environmental assessments. 

In time, and as the recovery funds diminishing, DCF came to see tremendous value in GIS as a permanent planning tool. Subsequently, in the Fall of 1994, the State's first full scale GIS program began under the auspices of DCF's District 11 Office of Research and Planning. Since that time, the office has tackled many projects that demonstrate the usefulness of GIS in social and health services planning, especially in complex metropolitan regions. The following are summaries of those projects. 

THE LIFE ZONE PROJECT

In the Fall of 1994, the GIS project in South Dade moved into a permanent facility within the District Administrator's office. Rather than using GIS specifically for community health outreach in South Dade, District 11 decided to apply the technology comprehensively in seven program areas in both Dade and Monroe Counties. The problem GIS and planning staff were given was to devise a strategy to better organize the District's $840 million social services resources to communities and populations with the greatest need.

By January 1995, the Office of Research and Planning devised a plan that called for an internal reorganization of the District's nearly 5000 employees and a reengineering of the District's philosophy regarding analysis of data and reporting information to the community. This plan came to be known as the "Life Zone Project." 

Borrowing heavily from the original CHAT zone concept, the Life Zone project required the District to shift its service delivery plan from a program-based organization to a geographic-based organization. In 1995, the District was charged with administering State and Federal resources through seven (7) core programs: 

  1. Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health; 
  2. Aging and Adult Services; 
  3. Children's Medical Services; 
  4. Children and Families; 
  5. Economic Services; 
  6. Developmental Services; and 
  7. Public Health. 

Operating under directives from the DCF's State Headquarters, locally these programs were independent of one another even though it was very apparent that a significant proportion of the District's clientele receive services from multiple programs. Unfortunately, over time the program-based organization acquired program-based information systems for client management, which did not and do not interact with each other. As a result, in complex metropolitan geography like South Florida, where social service program caseloads are very high, there is no mechanism for an accurate unduplicated client count for District-wide strategic planning, or the ability to track a single client across program lines to ensure quality service. Given the present trend for cutting social services, the District made a decision that the program-based scenario was too costly and inefficient. A new approach was needed.

The Life Zone project calls for a division of the District's jurisdiction into twelve (12) zones, or catchment areas. GIS was used to identify community and neighborhood boundaries, grouping them to create ten (10) life zones in Dade County and two (2) life zones in Monroe County. While social service zones were not uncommon in District 11, prior to the Life Zone project each program created their own independent zones arbitrarily drawn on street boundaries. Planning staff used GIS to demonstrate how common zones drawn to census or zip code boundaries would enhance a program's ability to capture important demographic information as well as track services over time. 

After establishing zone boundaries, client records were extracted from program client information systems and then uploaded into the GIS via geocoding in both ArcView and ArcInfo. Generally, three types of datasets were generated: 

  1. Social pathologies (i.e., teen pregnancy, child abuse, communicable diseases); 
  2. Client services (i.e., mental health counseling, food stamps, elderly assistance); and 
  3. Facilities (i.e., daycare centers, public health clinics, welfare offices). 

Consequently, using this data in GIS, we were able to calculate District-wide unduplicated calculations, and we were able to analyze programs regionally and in small areas like a zone or neighborhood with far great accuracy. 

Another important feature of the Life Zone project was the focus on community and neighborhood empowerment. Before the District implemented the Life Zone project, individual program administrators acted independently in targeting populations and communities with services under their direction. Further, community advocate groups seeking cooperative partnerships with the District could only look to one office for assistance: District Administration. This arrangement failed to give adequate emphases to measuring community quality of life and to providing communities with the tools for improvement. Under the Life Zone project, each zone is a collection of entire communities, which can be statistically profiled using GIS data from the U.S. Census summary tape files and our own client services databases. 

To further decentralize the Districts programs into the community, new position titles were created and senior program executives were reassigned. Today, every life zone has a "Life Zone Manager" responsible for overseeing service delivery in a defined geographic zone. The life zone manager is the liaison for the communities in his or her zone, and it is the life zone manager's job to ensure that the District's seven (7) programs are not under- or over- serving communities. Consequently, life zone managers have been provided new training in community development, GIS, strategic planning, data analysis, and more in order to promote their perspective away from programmatic viewpoints, towards comprehensive community points of view. The zone managers work closely with the Office of Research and Planning to create informational products useful to the community at public meetings where program issues are debated openly. Because all of this is community based, GIS is the core technology that enables the District to convert its confidential client data into meaningful aggregate information with more specificity than County or Zip Code level data. Information is power to a community!

COMMUNITY MAPPING

After the Life Zone project got under way and the first wave of GIS maps displaying social pathologies, services and facilities hit the street, the demand for specifically tailored small-area maps dramatically increased. Apparently, despite the growth in personal computer use and Internet services, few social services professional or community advocacy groups have access to statistical information needed to support their program in planning, evaluation and grant applications. Simple demographic information and social services data is admittedly very important to their programs; however, barriers prevent their effectively accessing and analyzing this data. Our initial point-on-polygon and thematic GIS maps greatly appealed to social services professionals because of the simplicity, graphic and intuitive nature of showing complex social problems over a geographic landscape.

At first, planning staff tried unsuccessfully to satisfy all the individual requests for GIS maps. However, it became quickly apparent that we could not meet the entire demand and at the same time complete our established priorities and goals building the office and the GIS capability. Therefore, after assessing the types and frequency of our requests over the past year, we designed a standard prototypical map that could be automated using ArcInfo's Arc Macro Language (AML). Consequently, two new applications were developed that provide rapid production of GIS maps for specific small-areas using existing GIS datasets:

  1. Community Resources Mapping System (CRMS), and 
  2. Community Indicators Mapping System (CIMS). 

The CRMS uses basic AML functionality to lead staff through a series of questions that ultimately creates a standardized presentation size GIS point map of a pre-selected area showing type, location and total frequency of pre-selected facilities, such as daycare centers, police stations, homeless shelters, or public housing sites. The requester can select one or all of the community resources of our ArcInfo point coverages currently available for mapping. 

Likewise, the CIMS also uses basic AML functionality to guide staff through questions that produces a standard presentation size GIS thematic map of a pre-selected area displaying either social pathology (i.e., teen pregnancy and child abuse) or client service (i.e., welfare payments and drug abuse counseling). The requester can select one item attached to the block group ArcInfo polygon coverage currently available for mapping. 

Both applications have helped meet the demand by standardizing a map composition in response to request made by internal District staff and external community advocacy groups, allowing us time to develop our GIS.

THE DADE ALLIANCE

Before she was called on by President Bill Clinton to serve as United States Attorney General, Janet Reno established an informal meeting of chief executives from public and private non-profit sector who together have influence on social policy in Dade County, Florida. This group, consisting of the United Way, DCF District 11, Dade County Public Schools, City of Miami, Metro-Dade County, State Attorney's Office, and Metro-Dade Police Department continued meeting periodically to discuss ways they could collectively promote coordinated planning. 

Today, the group has acquired an official budget and is formalizing strategies and goals, including the creation of a comprehensive baseline database and a steering committee to coordinate collecting and sharing of important planning data among Alliance member agencies. The District's use of GIS for social services planning quickly gained importance to Alliance members, who are becoming more adept to GIS issues like basemapping, sharing and privacy. As the CEOs in these agencies become more familiar with the benefits and challenges of using GIS as a tool for social planning, District 11 has been called on to navigate many of these decisions. In the coming months, the District will host the first "planning data coordinating committee" for the Alliance, where GIS will play a central role.

DADE COUNTY'S SOCIAL SERVICES PLAN 

Last year the Dade County Board of County Commission passed a resolution to create a "Social Services Master Plan" that will document the entire system of social services in the County, and provide Commissioners concrete facts upon which they can resolve funding issues. The entire system of social services includes many large and small public and private non-profit organizations, who all together contribute to an estimated $2 billion in annual social resource to Dade County residents. DCF is the principal contributor of this fund, which is delivered through direct services and through contracts with local public and private non-profit providers. The problem is that any single provider can request and receive funding from multiple sources (i.e., DCF, Metro-Dade County, United Way) and usually those funding sources never know who is funding who. In other words, it is very difficult to get an accurate accounting of the total funds delivered in Dade County. 

Consequently, and in light of the decreasing availability of social services funds, the Master Plan will attempt to establish a comprehensive baseline and document existing funding activities in order to address the issue of coordination and comprehensive planning. Since DCF has under its authority important planning databases, like vital statistics and state and federal entitlement programs, our office with GIS is geocoding multiple social services databases and aggregating them into census block group areas. This data is being made available to the County's GIS personnel working on the Master Plan for the Commission to create a baseline analysis from which the County can prioritize its spending on social services. From this initial work, our office and the County are strengthening our ability to coordinate and share data since both organizations use similar hardware and ArcInfo software. 

WELFARE REFORM

Recent legislative changes will alter programmatic responsibilities between the Federal government and the States. These changes rest on the notion that traditional social assistance programs are not promoting self-sufficiency and are too costly. Moreover, these changes reflect the idea that our federal government has grown too large to effectively address the issues at the community level. Known collectively as "New Federalism," state governments are now receiving federal block grants, or lump sums for social services, and states are now allowed to create new requirements for recipients of welfare. Florida passed its version of welfare reform, known as "Work And Gain Economic Self-Sufficiency" (WAGES), putting great pressure on local governments to move welfare recipients to work or education. Those who do not meet work or education requirements risk loosing their benefits within two years. 

As a result, welfare reform in Florida has caused Dade County leaders to refocus their energy in the direction of economic development, since the entire South Florida region, especially Dade County, stands to loose significant local resources in two years if approximately 40,000 welfare recipients are not placed in work or education programs. Consequently, our office is using GIS to identify spatial relationships between employment and education centers in relation to the welfare populations most at risk of loosing benefits. GIS is also used to evaluated proximity of available daycare for mothers who need child care support while they seek employment or education. We also using GIS to examine the relationship between tangential community development programs like the Federal Empowerment Zones and Enterprise Communities in relation to the welfare populations to help use those affirmative programs to promote economic development in blighted areas.

DADE COUNTY'S CITIZENSHIP CAMPAIGN 

New Federalism also has ushered in a social crisis of sorts especially painful to Dade County. With an estimated 50% of its population identifying itself as Hispanic and 40% identified as foreign born, Dade County is a gateway from Latin America and the Caribbean into the United States. Some of the new arrivals move out of South Florida, but the numbers show a vast majority choosing to stay in the region. Recently, Congress passed new regulations that ends social benefits to legal non-citizens within a matter of months. In Dade County the estimated number of legal non-citizens who will loose benefits is 57,000. 

Recognizing the tremendous economic disinvestment this would cause in the region, Metro-Dade, DCF and a consortium of local providers are mobilizing resources to conduct a citizenship campaign to help the most disadvantaged individuals to complete the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) requirements to become legal citizens before their benefits are cut off. Under this program, we are using GIS to analyze our client records for non-citizenship and then identify communities where the citizenship outreach teams should be organizing. 

MUNICIPAL AND LEGISLATIVE ASSESSMENTS 

Considering the ongoing defunding of social programs and changes produced by welfare reform, the District has become increasingly aware of the need to effectively communicate with local municipal officials, who will eventually feel the impact, and elected officials at all levels, who directly control DCF's policy and budget. To this end, we have acquired ArcInfo municipal and political district coverages from the County and State GIS offices, and then analyzed our geocoded client records to calculate very accurate assessments of client totals, rates and funding allocation for every city and political district in Dade and Monroe County. As changes in public policy are contemplated by Congress, our State Legislature or the local Commission, we immediately provide those officials with powerful GIS maps and charts illustrating where the impact will occur. GIS is a tremendous lobbying tool! 

CONCLUSION

Since 1993, Florida's GIS technology has managed to transfer from very advanced environmental and land management programs into social applications. Moreover, GIS is now so firmly planted into DCF's menu of planning tools that District 11 and the DCF's central Office of Standards and Evaluations have both made considerable investments into ArcInfo and ArcView. These application have caused a full scale reorganization of social services in District 11 and promise to alter the way the entire agency examines client data in the very near future. However, despite GIS's obvious benefits in the social arena, there are still serious concerns about client privacy and community stigmatization. In fact, but for our District Administrator's aggressive leadership in favor of GIS, our applications would not have progressed further than zip code level thematic mapping. Fortunately, we have a strong GIS champion locally and at the head of our agency in the Governor's cabinet. Thus, we fully expect GIS to continue to expand into the social services field in Florida because GIS basemap data is very accessible from local governments and water management districts, and because ArcView's desktop applications are cost effective and user friendly. 

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Andrew Dickman, AICP 
Senior Management Analyst 
Florida Department of Children and Families 
401 NW 2nd Ave., Suite N1007 
Miami, FL 33128 
Tel: (305) 377-7639 
Fax: (305 377-5504 
Email: dickmana@stu.law.nova.edu

Panagiotis Tsoumpas, MS 
Database Analyst 
Florida Department of Children and Families 
401 NW 2nd Ave., Suite N1007 
Miami, FL 33128 
Tel: (305) 377-7639 
Fax: (305 377-5504 
Email: panos_tsoumpas@dcf.state.fl.us 

Sifu Zhou, Ph.D. 
GIS Analyst 
Florida Department of Children and Families 
401 NW 2nd Ave., Suite N1007 
Miami, FL 33128 
Tel: (305) 377-7639 
Fax: (305 377-5504 
Email: sifu_zhou@dcf.state.fl.us