Pentti Junni , Ralf Lindgren

The Hydrographic Information System - Co-operation, Concept and Future

Abstract

In the world of maritime transport new technology is rapidly being taken into use for navigational purposes. The main important components in this development are GIS and GPS. Producers of nautical charts are facing the task to deliver their information in a suitable digital form and the demand is increasing. A global standard to define this product (Electronic Nautical Chart - ENC ), has been established by the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO).

The Finnish and Swedish Maritime Administrations are engaged in a co-operation since 1994 with the aim to define the next generations information system for management of all the hydrographic and nautical information needed in our products.

The Hydrographic Information System Project

The paper will present the major steps of our co-operation in design and specification of the Hydrographic Information System (HIS). The system will be described from a conceptual point of view. Future phases of the system implementation will be discussed.


Background

The ability to meet the increasing demand for nautical charts in a digital form is a challenge to hydrographic offices around the world. There are several aspects of this new digital product that will enforce major changes to the operations and systems within our offices.

In discussions between the hydrographic offices of Finland and Sweden we found that the situation is very similar in both countries. The present systems are primarily focused towards output of printed charts. The control of new information is not satisfactory. Updates are performed directly in a lot of products with potential risk of omissions or errors.

Reasons and Motives for Co-operation

We found that there were several good reasons to investigate further the possibility of a more close co-operation with the first aim to define and model the flow of information within our offices. If we could reach a common view here we would have a ground for continuing with the specification of improvements to our existing information systems.

Steps in the Design Process

Flow of information, conceptual model

A number of work items were activated within our co-operation in order to establish the common ground for systems specification. We investigated data models, updating procedures, pre-processing of incoming new information etc. The fundamental result of this preparatory work early in the project was what we called the Conceptual Model. This model describes the different processes that we saw needed to handle the information in an efficient way.

The HIS Conceptual Model

The conceptual model identifies three clearly separated steps of the data processing within our hydrographic departments.

We also identified the need for an overall systems layer with process- and quality control. We need functionality to control and monitor the information flow and to record status at important check points.

Compared with the present situation the information management as well as process control are the parts we have to establish or improve. These parts are more or less missing today.

Prototypes

Based on our conceptual model a specification for a prototype test (or benchmark) was written. A number of different GIS vendors participated and prepared a prototype based on their GIS. The aim of the prototypes from the offices point of view was to investigate how our ideas could be implemented in GIS’s that represent state-of-the-art in the GIS business. The vendors should achieve this in their respective system without adding major functionality by programming.

Major functionality in the prototype was:

The prototypes were evaluated thoroughly and we got a good understanding of the capability of modern GIS's. The trend towards database driven solutions was obvious. We learned a lot and most importantly we learned that a system that fulfilled our requirements completely did not exist. We realised that a lot of development is needed to build our Hydrographic Information System (HIS).

Final specification

Based on the experience gained from the prototype evaluation the final specification for phase 1 of the HIS was produced and proposals were requested from GIS vendors. Phase 1 of the systems include the Information Management part and Process Control.

This process of specification and evaluation required quite some time, about 8 months. In the first step of evaluation we reduced the list of proposals into a short-list with three systems. More clarifications were requested and discussions with these system suppliers took place.

A contract for development of the HIS for Finland and Sweden was signed in May 1996 and delivery is now planned for the autumn 1997. The database solution will be implemented in SDE and ArcView as well as ArcInfo will be used to manage the information.

Detailed design

After the selection of supplier for the development work a lot of design work has been performed. At the time of writing this paper there is still work to be done on this level. Our requirements have to be broken down into manageable pieces that will fit the choosen software environment. This work requires a lot of interaction between the supplier and the customer. The supplier has choosen a method of design by prototypes. A series of prototypes are delivered to test design issues and show the evolution of the system. On the customer side this activates both endusers as well as developers and designers.

Major and Vital Functionality

The requirements for functionality in HIS in many ways goes beyond and expands the possibilities of the basic GIS components. Dedicated functionality will be implemented and the most important expansions are described below.

Process and input unit control

When new data (completely new features or changes to existing features ) enters HIS this is always performed in what is called a Job. The Job links a selected process with a set of new data and the process contains several steps normally. The results, statistics and any comments of each process step is recorded in a process log.
Furthermore the source and general quality information of any new data is always described in a meta object or Source Document which is stored in the database. Each feature is linked to a valid Source Document.

Control of entering data , job-process-log

The important issue is to maintain a defined audit trail with regard to processing and source information.

Validation and integrity checks

Validation is a process step where new information is carefully controlled and evaluated both internally within the data set and against already existing information. The process step may be defined so that validation requires a "sign off " of two operators (or operator and supervisor). A comprehensive toolbox of integrity checks will be implemented to assist in this process. This toolbox will provide tests for internal and external consistency as well as geometrical and topological conditions.

Multiple scales management

Within the database there is a need to maintain the information prepared for different scale layers in addition to the base layer where the best available data is managed. The main reason for the existence of these scale layers in the HIS database is the fact that we can not rely on automated methods (generalisation etc.) for producing products in large scales. The transfer of new information from base layer to a range of scale layers is controlled in a similar way as input to base layer. This will be based on a transfer queue where references to new ,changed and deleted features automatically appear after commit to base layer.

Multiple Scales Management

History management

The HIS will have functionality to view the situation in the database at a given previous date and time. This is may be required to check the contents of an issued product. There will also be functionality to backtrace into history for an individual feature.

Complex and composite features (object management)

The data model includes relations to other features which enables what define as complex feature. A complex feature consists of a number of complete features (each with its own geometry and attributes) somehow related to each other. When editing or changing any part of a complex feature the operator has to be informed that the feature is a part of a complex. A good example is a fairway area consisting of navigational aids, fairway area, navigational lines etc.

The composite feature is a feature which is built up by a set of components. The components are sometimes not complete features of their own ( the may lack geometry). You normally navigate to the components through its parent object. An example of a composite could be a lighthouse with radar reflector and lights.

Editing

The editing functionality of ArcView will be expanded and customised for the specific purpose of HIS. For some tasks the functionality of ArcInfo will be used.

ENC output

Export of information for electronic nautical charts according to the standard of the International Hydrographic Organization ( IHO S57e3) will be implemented in phase I of HIS.

Future Phases of HIS

Within the co-operation between Sweden and Finland we have outlined the next two phases of HIS. In phase II we will establish the product management part of our conceptual model. It is essential to get the information from HIS easily transferred to the product systems for printed charts and publications. There is most probably a need also to define digital products other than ENC. The work in phase II may involve modification of existing product systems as well as implementing new ones.

Phase III is planned to result in a complete quality management system for the total information flow of our hydrographic departments including Source Data Management and Product Management.

 

 

References

Junni, Pentti: A Next Generation Hydrographic Information System. Presented paper at the International Hydrographic Conference, Monaco, 1997.

Lindgren, Ralf: ECDIS - an onboard navigational system for marine traffic and how to provide data for it. Presented paper at the AM/FM-GIS Nordic Region Conference, Lahtis, Finland, 1996.


Authors

Pentti Junni, M.Sc.
Development Manager, Hydrography and Waterways Department
Finnish Maritime Administration
P.O.Box 171, FIN-00181 Helsinki, Finland
Telephone: +358 204484 485
E-mail: pentti.junni@mkl.fi

Ralf Lindgren, M.Sc.
Development Manager, Hydrographic Service
Swedish Maritime Administration
S-60178 Norrk�ping, Sweden
Telephone: +46 11 191371
E-mail : ralf.lindgren@shipadm.se