M. M. Yagoub and Taher Buyong

GIS Applications for Dumping Site Selection

Abstract: There is an increasing commercial, residential and infrastructure development due to the population growth and this has negative impact on the environment. One of these impacts is due to location of dumping site in unsuitable areas. Locating a dumping site in a suitable area is a very time consuming process. The use of GIS in selection process will reduce the time and enhance the accuracy.

The aim of this paper is to highlight a user interface developed under ArcView 3.0a using a combination of avenue and dialogs to help in the process of dumping site selection. The most important conclusion is that non-GIS users can select interactively their site within 10-15 minutes. However, if the user is not satisfy with the output zones he/she can iterates again and again.


1.0 Introduction

The International Environment Technology Center in Osaka (Japan) under the United Nation Environmental Program (UNEP) has identified recycling, incineration, composting, and landfill (dumping) as suitable methods for solid waste management (UNEP 1996). The most common waste-management practice is landfill, mainly because of its cheapness in comparison to other methods.

1.1 Dumping site selection

The selection of the dumping site (landfill) is a big question that faces local authorities because it represents a point of confluence of science, social science, and planning. Urban planners and city managers throughout the world are now confronting this issue within a much broader social development context. "Not in my backyard" may be the mantra facing decision makers as the volume of solid waste generated in rural and urban areas increases (UNEP, 1996) http//www.unep.org/

Among the factors that governing the selection of the dumping site are:

The criteria for selecting a dumping site is almost similar all over the world with some constraints related to locality. However, some of the criteria factors may conflict with each other; therefore, some compromises or tradeoffs between criteria will be necessary if the process is to materialized (Michael, 1991).

1.2 The role of GIS in solid waste management

The role of Geographic Information Systems (GIS)in solid waste management is very large as many aspects of its planning and operations are highly dependent on spatial data. In general, GIS plays a key role in maintaining account data to facilitate collection operations; customer service; analyzing optimal locations for transfer stations; planning routes for vehicles transporting waste from residential, commercial and industrial customers to transfer stations and from transfer stations to landfills; locating new landfills and monitoring the landfill. GIS is a tool that not only reduce time and cost of the site selection, but also provide a digital data bank for future monitoring program of the site.

Many companies work in the filed of solid waste management in Malaysia have allocated budget for GIS. For example, Alam Flora Sdn. Bhd. (AFSB) is a company responsible for the collection, transportation, and disposal of 70% of Malaysia's solid waste. It has taken an initiative to setup a GIS like ArcInfo and ArcView as key components for managing its information (Keir, 1997).

1.3 User interface

Designing an interface involves combining the available tools with a set of user requirements and good design principles (Esri, 1993). The goal of an application programmer should be to create an interface that performs the desired tasks easily, efficiently, and requiring a minimal time for training. Whether the design is for small scale or big application the attention should be paid to organization, logical flow, visual appearance, ease of use, error checking, and on line help. The general principles that applicable to all user interface designs are given by Sommerville (1996): These principles are user familiarity, consistency, minimal surprise, recoverability, and user guidance.

The increasing level of complexity of GIS systems requires special consideration to the user-friendliness of the system. This may be discussed from two points of view: from the viewpoint of specialized users, calling for sophisticated capabilities; and from the viewpoint of wide audiences, requiring the ease of use for non-GIS users. Raper and Rhind (1990) argue that ease of use is a vital criterion for the selection of an appropriate GIS. It is generally accepted that a system, which is easy to use, can help cut recruitment and training costs and help retain staff.

1.4 The objective of this paper

The aim of this paper is oriented towards developing a user interface for selecting a dumping site in Langkawi-Malaysia with special emphasis on ease of use using ArcView 3.0a from Esri. The main intention here is not to create new functions but to reduce the circle (access to existing functions) through which non-GIS user will revolve around ArcView to carry out suitability analysis (modeling). The ability to describe complex geographic modeling with straightforward options for a greater number of users is well recommended by many researchers (Wilson, 1990).

2.0 User requirements/ the call for GIS

Pulau Langkawi is one of the tourist islands in Malaysia. It is located in the north west coast of Peninsular Malaysia at latitude 6 15�North and longitude 99 40�East. It occupies an area of 387 km2 and has a total population of 29,084 according to 1990 census. The population is expected to exceed 38,000 by the year 2000.

The people of Pulau Langkawi have complained about the scarcity of dumping site facilities and asked the government to locate a new dumping site. The site must meet the requirements of the Environmental Quality Act (EQA) 1974 issued by the Department of Environment(DOE)Malaysia. For more detail about DOE the reader can refer to the web site: http//www. jas.sains.my/doe/.

A study carried by Lee (1997) for the production of zoning plans for Pulau Penang (Malaysia) has showed that to produce one set of zoning plans requires 3 or 4 technicians working for a period of 3 to 4 weeks. Using GIS modeling the zoning plan can be produced in an hour or less. A same time 3-4 weeks utilizing 3 to 4 technicians is expected for locating a dumping site manually in Pulau Langkawi, because the two islands have almost similar area.

In order to reduce the time and labor for locating a dumping site in Langkawi, the local authority has identified GIS as a potential and valuable tool that can be used in the siting process. It is then decided to develop a user interface that provides a GIS analysis to identify a list of suitable dumping sites for further investigations. Furthermore, it is realized that the data obtained for the siting process can be used in for other purposes using the same GIS principles.

2.1 ArcView as a system for development environment

The trend towards desk top GIS has been increasing significantly in the last few years (Lee, 1997). This is mainly due to the increase in the PC capabilities and reduction in cost. This trend has compelled GIS software vendors to redesign their strategy to suit the situation. For example, Esri has release ArcInfo NT as a substitute to ArcInfo for workstation and a similar case has been adopted by many other GIS software vendors such as SmallWorld and GenaSys.

In this study the user interface is built using ArcView GIS 3.0a mainly due to the following reasons:

For more detail the reader can refer to Esri web sit at: http//www.Esri.com

ArcView as a low cost desktop GIS system has gained wide use and for this reason numerous efforts to improve its spatial analysis is done by many organizations other than Esri. For example, SWEGIS. It has developed an extension that can help in spatial analysis under ArcView (Buffer, Clip, Dissolve, Distance, Eliminate, Erase, Intersect, Union, etc.). For more detail about this extension the reader can contact: mikael@swegis.com

2.2 System description and functions

The system developed here is based on ArcView. Avenue and Visual Basic are used as the programming languages. The main objective of the system is to carry out suitability analysis (modeling) in a user friendly way. User can fill in blank spaces or select an option. After gathering the required information, the system will execute operations hidden from the user and finally display the alternative zones and the best dumping site. The user input to the system is an attribute selection and the output is a graphical map and a report showing the final suitable zones.

The system consists of a series of buttons (Figure 1). Once the user clicks on a button the system prompts the user to select a suitable value for modeling. For example if the user clicks on "Groundwater" button, then the system will:

Other buttons such as Districts, Landuse, Rainfall, Roads, and Soil (Figure 1) have the same functions as "Groundwater" button described above.

Paying attention to the principles of user interface, consistency is maintained between the sequences and prompts for all buttons. These sequence are:

Figure 1: A user clicks on Groundwater button, the groundwater theme is activated and it is attributes are displayed for the user to select.

Figure 1: A user clicks on Groundwater button, the groundwater theme is activated and its attributes are displayed for the user to select.

The button "Final Zones" (Figure 1) allow the user to view the final zones satisfying all the model parameters (criteria) and a report about the zones (Figure 2).

The program for the "Final Zones" button checks if the modeling process is initiated and checks how many parameters are used for modeling. If there is only one parameter, it will be displayed as a suitable zone, if there are two, the common area will be taken as a suitable zone. More than two parameters will be treated in such away that each two parameters will be intersected together. The central function of this option is analogous to INTERSECT in ArcInfo. If there is no common area between any two selected parameters the system gives notification about that. In general the system provides error, information, and warning messages for the user whenever it is necessary.

For example, if a user would like to locate a new facility satisfying the following criteria.
1. To be in district Kuah.
2. To be in areas with soil type clay.
3. To be in areas with low groundwater productivity.
4. To be within 500m from the main roads.

To find zones that satisfying the above criteria the user first clicks on the button "District" and from the available districts he must select Kuah. Upon the selection, the system will abstract areas that fall in district Kuah only, save them as a separate theme and display them. Similar sequences will be done for soil type and groundwater once the user clicks on "Soil" and "Groundwater" buttons. Clicking on "Road" button the system will prompt the user to enter the suitable buffer distance in this case 500m.

To find the final zones satisfying the above criteria the user can click on the "Final zones" button. The system will find the common areas between the abstracted themes and finally displays the suitable zones and a report about them (Figure 2).

Figure 2: A map showing final suitable zones associated with a report.

Figure 2: A map showing final suitable zones associated with a report.

2.3 Problems associated with the system development

During the development of the system the following problems are encountered:

Conclusion

Suitability analysis and spatial modeling need to be carried out easily in order to allow decision-makers to participate in the process of zoning rather than forward a hard copy master plans for them. In this study a system was developed under ArcView using Avenue, dialog designer, and Visual Basic. The system enables non-GIS users to carry out suitability analysis interactively in order of 10-15 minutes under a PC with 32 MB RAM,166 MHz and 5 MB data size. This time increases or decreases depending on the speed of the CPU, memory size, and data size. Many iterations (simulations) can be carried out with different scenarios and different results are obtained. The results are displayed under ArcView environment in a form of a map showing suitable zones with a report about these zones. The developed system helped to convince many decision-makers, who are previously reluctant to deal with the rigid command structure of GIS, to use GIS as a decision modeling tool.

References

Esri (1993). ARC Macro Language-Developing ArcInfo Menus and Macros with AML. Environmental System Research Institute, Inc. California, Redlands, USA.

Keir, A.(1997). "The role of GIS in the privatization of Malaysia' solid waste management.", 6th Esri South Asia Users Conference,8-10 Sep. Penang, Malaysia.

Lee, L. M.(1997). "Creating large digital maps for municipal planning applications using desktop GIS- The Penang Experience.", 6th Esri South Asia Users Conference,8-10 Sep. Penang, Malaysia.

Michael, T. C.(1991). "Waste disposal facility siting.",Proc.7th International Conference on Solid Waste Management and Secondary Materials, Philadelphia, USA.

Raper, J. And D. Rhind (1990). "UGIX (A):The design of spatial language interface for topological vector GIS", Proc. the 4th International symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Zurich, Switzeland,vol.1, pp.405-412.

Sommerville, I.(1996). Software Engineering. 5th ed. Addison-Wesley, pp.742,UK.

UNEP (1996). International Source Book on Environmentally Sound Technologies for Municipal Solid Waste Management. Technical Publication Series (6), UNEP, International Environment Technology Center, Osaka/Shiga, Japan.

Wilson, P. M. (1990). "Get your desktop metaphor off my drafting table: User interface design for Spatial data handling",Proc.4th International symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Zurich, Switzerland, vol. 1, pp. 455-62.


M. M. Yagoub and Taher Buyong
Faculty of Geoinformation Science & Engineering
Center for Geographic Information & Analysis
University Teknologi Malaysia
80990 Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Tel:(607)-5502909
Fax:(607)-5566163
E-mail : 6GIS001A@UTMJB.UTM.MY
6gis001@utmjb.utm.my