Seung-mahn Ahn, Kyoo-seock Lee

 

The Survey and Analysis of Landscape Resources

at Muju Kuchon Valley in Mt. Teogyu National Park


 

ABSTRACT

 

In Korea, the national park is designated for preserving and conserving scenic landscape resources, and for visitors to enjoy those scenic views for recreation. So management goal is, that resources should be inherited to the following descendants because the current generation has inherited it from ancestors. In order to manage the national park effectively, national parks in Korea are classified into four zones - Natural Preservation Zone, Natural Environment Zone, Settlement Zone and Mass Facility Zone - based on the Natural Park Act.  However, in Korea there is no definite criteria, and the data is not enough to manage the national park resources properly.   For that reason, National Park management needs more accurate information.   This study is done by an analysis of landscape resources in Mt. Teogyu National Park using GIS and RS with field survey, database construction.  Based on the results of this study, the following discussions are derived.

 

1. Ecological fragmentation occurred mainly due to Muju Resort development and subsequent road construction.  One road is under construction making serious deforestation.

 

2. Part of study area(10.69 km2) included in Wondang watershed needs to be included in the National Park.   To manage National Park effectively, inclusion of this area must be accomplished.

 

3.  Inaccurate data and lack of data.  Based on Natural Park Authority data, total area of Mt. Teogyu National Park is 219km2.  while that is 228.7km2 from 1:25,000 scale topographic map data.   There is no wildlife habitat data.  So ridge level is used for delineating wildlife habitat.

 

4. GIS integrated with RS provides helpful information for protecting scenic and valuable landscape resources in the study site.  After performing this study,  it was found that there are many valuable resources other than NPZ.  So, more research based on the precise inventory of the current resources should be performed.

 

5. Additional survey and research needs to be done.  This study is still in progress.  Visiblity analysis needs to be done for landscape impact assessment.

 

 1. Introduction

 

In Korea, the national park is designated for preserving and conserving scenic landscape resources, and for visitors to enjoy those scenic views for recreation. So management goal is, that resources should be inherited to the following descendants because the current generation has inherited it from ancestors. In order to manage the national park effectively, national parks in Korea are classified into four zones - Natural Preservation Zone, Natural Environment Zone, Settlement Zone and Mass Facility Zone - based on the Natural Park Act.  However, in Korea there is no definite criteria, and the data is not enough to manage the national park resources properly.   For that reason, National Park management needs more accurate information.   

 Therefore, purpose of this study is

1. To survey landscape resources of Muju Kuchon valley in Mt. Teogyu National Park to construct resource database using GIS, and RS.

2. To provide the reasonable ground for managing landscape resources of the study site to protect the area which has high biological diversity

  

2. Research Methods

 

2.1. Study Site

 

The study site is Wondang Watershed of Mt. Teogyu National Park which includes Muju Kuchon Valley, and 33 famous, historic, and fabulous scenic sites.  Mt. Teogyu National Park was designated as the 10th National Park in Korea on Feb. 1, 1975.  

 Total Area of study site is 115.6 km2.  As we can see in Figure 1, Mt. Teogyu National Park boundary was not delineated along the watershed boundary.  So part of study area is not included in Mt. Teogyu National Park.  So, 10.69 km2 of outside park area is included in the study site with 104.94 km2  of park area.

 

 

Figure 1. Muju Kuchun Valley Watershed

 

2.2. Study Procedure

 

Figure 2 shows the study procedure in this research.

 

  

Figire 2. Study procedure

 

2.3. Input Data

 

In order to select thematic layer for analyzing landscape resources in Mt. Teogyu National Park, literature survey about former study  of Mt. Teogyu National park was performed.  Since 1993 more than 10 times of field survey were done to collect the necessary data.

Based on the field data, three types of landscape resources are selected.  They are as follows.

 1) To understand the current status of study site, watershed, zoning, landuse, and road network are surveyed.

 2) To find an area with high biological diversity,  forest stand, vegetation, and wildlife habitat are collected.

 3) To preserve scenic area, sub-alpine meadow area, river corridor,  are selected.

  Table 1. shows input data used in this study.

 

Table 1. Input Data

Thematic Layer

Scale

Source data

Type

Attribute value

DEM

10m X 10m   

Topographic Map

Line

Elevation

Watershed

1 : 25,000   

DEM

Polygon

Watershed

Road
network

1 : 25,000   

Topographic Map

Line

Road distribution

Stream network

1 : 25,000   

Topographic Map

Line

Stream distribution

Fortst stand

1 : 25,000   

Forest Stand Map

Polygon

Forest stand , age, DBH, Canopy density

Vegetation

1:50,000   

Current Vegetation Map

Polygon

Forest Community

Zoning

1 : 60,000   

Park Visitor Map

Polygon

Zoning

Landuse

30m X 30m   

RSdata(Landsat TM)

raster

Landuse

 

 

3. Results

 

Above data were entered in GIS, ArcView and ArcView Spatial Analyst, and RS system, PCI for deriving results.  

 

3.1. Zoning

 

As we can see in Table 2,  There are 96.3km2 for Natural Environment Zone(NEZ), 3.2km2 for Mass Facility Zone, 2.8km2 for Settlement Zone,  2.7km2 for Natural Preservation Zone, and 10.7km2 for Outside Park Area.  NEZ covers nine tenth of study site excluding outside park area.  Outside park has a separate zoning scheme.  Most of the development activities occur within NEZ which may cause permanent destruction once developed.  So, the present zoning does not seem to be well managed.

 

  

 Figure 3. Zoning

 

Table 2. Zoning

Zoning

Area(km2)

Natural Preservation Zone

2.7    

Natural Environment Zone

96.3    

Mass Facility Zone

3.2    

Settlement Zone

2.8    

Outside Park Area

10.7    

Total

*115.7    

 * : rounding error

 

3.2. Current Landuse and Ecological Fragmentation by Pavement Roads  

 

 To understand current landuse conditions, 30m resolution Landsat TM(115-35,1998) data were used for deriving land cover classification.  Five landuse type, settlement, cultivated, resort, temple and forest are interpreted manually after image enhancement by stretching.  As we can see in Table 3, the largest landuse type is forest whose area is 99.7km2. Then, it is followed by cultivated land with 7.1km2 , Muju resort  with 7.0km2, settlement with 1.8km2, temple with 0.02km2.  Temple and resort are easily distinguished because it is located within forest. However, the discrimination between settlement and cultivated area was not easy, so it was done by referring ground truth information.

 

 

Figure 4. Landuse

 

Table 3. Landuse

Landuse

Area(km2)

SETTLEMENT

1.8   

CULTIVATED LAND

7.1   

RESORT

7.0   

TEMPLE

0.02   

FOREST

99.7   

Total

115.6   

 

As we can see in Figure 4, and Figure 5,  Muju Kuchon valley watershed(Wondang watershed)is fragmented ecologically  by road construction due to resort development, and this  trend  tends to be worse.  The cultivated area are located along the road. Now, Kuchon valley watershed is fragmented into four pieces.  Figure 5 shows ecological fragmentation by pavement roads.  The road between C and D does not seem to be fragmented in Figure 4.  However, it was confirmed in the field survey that this road divides the area causing ecological fragmentation. The road between B and D is under construction making a serious deforestation.

 

 

Figure 5. Ecological fragmentation by pavement roads

 

Table 4.  Ecological fragmentation by pavement roads

Fragemented Site

Area(km2)

A

15.9    

B

44.4    

C

48.2    

D

7.2    

Total

*115.7    

 * : rounding error

3.3 Wildlife habitat

 

In terms of wildlife habitat,  6 order , 15 family, 32 species of mammal are surveyed(Ministry of Domestic Affairs, 1993).  As animal treasures(natural monuments) in Korea, Lutra 1. Lutra(otter), Moschus moschiferus parvipes Hollister(musk deer), and Pteromys volans(flying squirrel) are dedicated. And Ursus sp.(bear), and Canis lupus chanco(korean gray wolf), and Panthera pardust(Korean leopard)are endangered species. Two Panthera pardus(leopard)were captured in Mt. Teogyu, but cannot be found since 1963.  Additional species, Sus scrofa coreanus Hude(Wild boar), Hydropotes inermis argyropus(Chinese water deer), Meles meles  melanogenys Allen & Andrews(badger), Nyctereutes procynoides koreansis Mori(raccoon dog), are now surviving within park area.  However, there were no habitat maps for these four species.  So, the habitat map was made based on the degree of ridge after interview of national park management officials and residents.  The ridge level is a important factor of wildlife habitat movement and habitat.  Above four mammals move along 7/10 to 8/10 ridge level.  So, above 6/10 ridge level to ridge line was delineated for protecting wildlife habitat.  10m x10m size DEM grid  cell was used in ArcView Spatial analysis for this.  As we can see in Figure 6 and Table 5, the area along around Hyangjokbong(1614m, peak), chungbong, Jibong, and Kochilbong are highly assumed to be wildlife habita.  And it covers 47.2km2(40.8%) of study site.  In wildlife habitat analysis  Muju resort area was excluded because wildlife movement corridor was fragmented by it.

 

Figure 6. Wildlife habitat analysis from ridge level

 

Table 5. Wildlife habitat analysis from ridge level

Ridge Level

Area(km2)

       ~2/10

9.6    

2/10~4/10

20.7    

4/10~6/10

24.4    

6/10~      

47.2    

Muju Resort

13.6    

Total

*115.5    

 * : rounding error

3.4. Sub-alpine meadow landscape

 

 The sub-alpine meadow landscape exists along ridge from Hyangjokbong to Samkeori.  There are only a few sub-alpine meadow landscapes in Korea.  So, this landscape needs to be preserved. There are unique, and diverse species of vegetation that can be seen in high mountain area.   As  herbs, Hemerocallis fulva(Day lily), Hosta longipes(Plantain lily), Sanguisorba ahkusanensis(Burnet), Bupleurum falcatum(Thoroughwax), Spergula arvensis, Peducularis resupinata(wood betony, Lousewort), Lychnis cognata(Lychnis), Gernium knuthii(Granesbill), Veratrum patulum(False hellebore), Synurus delteoides, Ligularia fischiry, and Astilbe Chinensis var. lilacina(False goatsbeard) grow(Kim et. al., 1994).  As shrubs, Lespedeza maxinowczii(Bush clover), Lespedeza bicola(Bush clover), Rhododendron schlippenbachii(Royal azalea), Symplocos chinensis(Symplolcos Family), Sasa borealis grow.  This landscape is worth preserving.  As we can see in Figure 7, sub-alpine meadow landscape map was made by creating 200m width buffer zone along the ridge line. 200m is the maximum width of sub-alpine meadow landscape from ridge line.  The hiking trail makes impacts and deteriorates the landscape because it crosses this landscape along the ridge line.  So the necessary protection should be implemented.  

 

Figure 7. Sub-alpine meadow landscape

 

3.5. River Corridor landscape

 

In terms of river corridor landscape, Muju Kuchon valley which developed riffle fall, rapids, pool, and fond is in harmony with spectacular rocks.  As we can see in Figure 8, there are 33 famous scenic sites.  And excluding Hyangjokbong, Naje-tongmun, and Paikryun-temple, 30 scenic sites are distributed along the main stream.  Only Naje-tongmun, and Paikryun-temple are Historic resource, and the other are Natural resource formed by erosion of rock or rock table.

 200m width Buffer Zone is created done along the main stream in Kuchon valley watershed to preserve this landscape.  Mass Facility Zone are excluded in delineation.  13.06 km2 area of study site is included in this river corridor landscape. As we can see in Table 6, this landscape includes 31 of famous 33 Muju scenic sites.  Wolha-tahn is excluded in buffer zone because it is in Mass Facility Zone.  This landscape is partially located in developed areas, roads, and forests.

 

 

Figure 7. River Corridor landscape


Table 6. Muju 33 Scenic Resources Distribution

No

Name

Zoning

Buffer

Resource Type

1.

Naje-tongmun

Natural Envrionment Zone

Excluded

cultural

2.

Eunkoo-ahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

3.

Cheongeum-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

4.

Wahryong-tahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

5.

Hahksoo-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

6.

Ilsa-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

7.

Hahmbyuk-soh

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

8.

Gahyeui-ahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

9.

Choowol-tahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

10.

Mahnjo-tahn

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

11.

Pahoi

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

12.

Sooshim-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

13.

Seshim-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

14.

sookyung-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

15.

Wolha-tahn

Mass Facility Zone

Excluded

Natural

16.

Ieenwol-tahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

17.

Lion-tahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

18

Chungryu-dong

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

19

Beepah-tahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

20.

Dahyeon-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

21.

Koowol-tahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

22.

Kumpoh-tahn

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

23.

Hotahn-ahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

24.

Chungryugye

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

25.

Ahnshim-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

26.

Shinyang-dahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

27.

Myunggyung-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

28.

Koochun Waterfal

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

29.

Paikryun-tahm

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

30.

Yeonhah Waterfall

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

31.

Leesohk-dae

Natural Envrionment Zone

Included

Natural

32.

Paikryun-temple

Natural Envrionment Zone

Excluded

Cultural

33.

Hyangjeok-bong

Natural Preservation Zone

Excluded

Natural

 

3.6. Forest landscape

 

 There are four types of vegetation maps in Korea.

1.Degree of Green Naturality(DGN) Map

2.Detailed Survey of DGN Map

3.Current Vegetation Map

4.Forest Stand Map

DGN map and Detailed DGN Map are not appropriate for forest landscape analysis.  The forest stand map contains information of forest stand, age, diameter of breast height(DBH), and canopy density while current vegetation map contains the structure of forest community only.  So, at first forest stand map and current vegetation map were compared.  However, the difference between Current Vegetation Map and Forest  Stand Map is  52.km2 (45.1%) of study site as we can see in Figure 9.  Additional survey and update are required to use forest stand map and current vegetation map,  Future research is needed for forest landscape analysis.

  

Table 7. Difference between Current Vegetation Map and Forest  Stand Map

unit : are(100m2)

Current Vegetation Map Legend

Difference between C.V.Map and F.S.Map

Symbol

Community

Error(area)

Error(%)

Total

No data

No community Information

16,729,000

99.9

16,746,700

PH0

Pinus rigida community

2,561,000

79.1

3,236,100

PH5

P. rigida-L.leptolepis community

1,464,500

60.3

2,427,700

CA0

Pinuus densiflora community

13,536,800

91.1

14,859,800

PG0

Larix leptolepis community

5,039,500

71.1

7,089,000

DA0

Quercus mongolica community

4,683,600

9.1

51,205,600

DC2

Q.variabilis-Q. aliena community

392,200

10.4

3,788,300

DC0

Q. variabilis community

411,700

26.0

1,586,200

CA3

P. densiflora-Q.variabilis community

1,912,800

39.2

4,879,100

DC6

Q.variabilis-P.densiflora community

543,300

80.8

672,200

PG3

L.leptolepis-P.densiflora community

920,800

81.1

1,135,700

DE0

Quercus acutissima community

877,300

45.1

1,943,800

DA1

Q. mongolica-Q. serrata community

707,900

78.1

906,500

DG0

Betula ermani community

147,900

60.5

244,500

DY0

Fraxinus mandshurica community

 

0.0

1,441,100

DE3

Q. acutissima-P.densiflora community

94,400

29.9

315,800

DH5

C.laxiflora-P.densiflora community

24,800

100.0

24,800

PF0

Pinus koraiensis community

683,300

100.0

683,300

DF0

Quercus dentata community

241,000

98.1

245,700

PO0

Castanea creanta community

251,500

65.2

385,700

CA2

P.densiflora-Q.serrata community

136,500

41.0

333,300

DB0

Quercus serrata community

54,000

14.6

369,200

DI0

Carpinus tschomoskii community

27,900

9.8

285,500

PG1

L.leptolepis-Q.mongolica community

136,900

49.8

275,000

CA1

P.densiflora-Q.mongolica community

9,300

60.8

15,300

CD0

A. koreana community

138,700

100.0

138,700

CD2

A.koreana-Q.mongolica community

163,000

100.0

163,000

DAG0

Rhododendron schlippenbachii community

104,900

100.0

104,900

GK0

Grass land

123,900

100.0

123,900

 Total

52,118,400

45.1

115,626,400

  

 

Figure 9. Difference between Current Vegetation Map and Forest  Stand Map

 

 

4. Discussion

 

 Throughout this survey and analysis, following discussions are derived.

 

1. Ecological fragmentation occurred mainly due to Muju Resort development and subsequent road construction.  One road is under construction making serious deforestation.

 

 2. Part of study area(10.69 km2) included in Wondang watershed needs to be included in the National Park.   To manage National Park effectively, inclusion of this area must be accomplished.

 

3.  Inaccurate data and lack of data

Based on Natural Park Authority data, total area of Mt. Teogyu National Park is 219km2.  while that is 228.7km2 from 1:25,000 scale topographic map data.   There is no wildlife habitat data.  So ridge level is used for delineating wildlife habitat.

 

4. GIS integrated with RS provides helpful information for protecting scenic and valuable landscape resources in the study site.  After performing this study,  it was found that there are many valuable resources other than NPZ.  So, more research based on the precise inventory of the current resources should be performed.

 

5. Additional survey and research needs to be done.  This study is still in progress.

Visiblity analysis needs to be done for landscape impact assessment.

 

 

Reference

 

1.

Lee, Chahng-hah, Seung-mahn Ahn, Kyoo-seock Lee, 1998, Comparison of Topographic, Vegetation, Scenic Resource Characteristics between Natural Preservation Zone and Natural Environment Zone in Mt. Teogyu National Park, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 7(1) : 49-61

2.

Kim, Gab-tae, Joon-seon Kim, Gab-cheul Choo, Tae-won Um, 1994, Studies on the Structure of Forest Community at Natural Conservation Zone in Mt. Teogyu National Park, Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 7(2) : 164-171

3.

Oh, Koo-kyoon, Sei-cheon Kim, Kyung-jae Lee, 1994, The Present States and Management Proposal of Tokyusan National Park, Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 7(2) : 270-295

4.

Lee, Kyoo-seock, 1998, A study on the Effective Use of Environmental Information System-focused on the accuracy of raw data-, Korean Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment 7(2) : 27-35

5.

Ministry of Home affairs, 1993, Natural Resources Survey in National Park - Mt. Teogyu National Park -

6.

National Park Association, 1997, Tokyusan National Park Natural Ecosystem Preservation Plan

7.

Kim, Seong-hee, 1994, The Analysis of the Natural Landscape of Kuchon valley in Mt. Teogyu National Park, M.S., Thesis at Sejong University

8.

Kwon, Tae-ho, Koo-kyoon Oh, Joon-woo Lee, 1994, Use Impacts on Environmental Deteriorations of Trail and Campsite in Mt. Teogyu National Park, Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 7(2) : pp. 241-251

 


Seung-mahn Ahn

Graduate Student in Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea

Tel : 082-331-290-7853

Fax : 82-331-290-7850

E-mail : oikos69@nature.skku.ac.kr

 

Kyoo-seock Lee

Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 440-746, Korea

Tel : 082-331-290-7853

Fax : 82-331-290-7850

E-mail : leeks@yurim.skku.ac.kr